|
| FOUNDING
STATEMENT
(english
and spanish )
Dear
Compañeras y Compañeros,
We
jointly offer our solidarity in opposing the Plan Puebla Panama
(PPP) and in constructing democratic and just alternatives
for Mexico and Central America. We continue to look to partner
organizations in Mexico and Central America for guidance in
defining future roles for the undersigned organizations to
take in the struggle against the PPP.
We
collectively see the PPP, Free Trade Area of the Americas
(FTAA) and the Central American Free Trade Agreements (CAFTA)
as a package of corporate globalization projects for Latin
America that are destructive to community-based initiatives
for economic, social and environmental justice.
At
an October 1, 2001 meeting in Washington D.C. Mexico Solidarity
Network, CISPES, Campaign for Labor Rights, Nicaragua Network,
ACERCA, EPICA, NISGUA, Global Exchange, Center for Health
Environment and Justice, Committee for Indigenous Solidarity
(DC), and Rights Action, later joined by IDEX and the Social
Justice Committee of Montreal, identified the following possible
strategies to support the struggle against the Plan Puebla
Panama:
•
A broad-based education campaign on PPP targeted at US constituencies
• The development of popular education material in English
and Spanish.
• Mobilization of US constituencies to lobby congressional
representatives
on related PPP issues.
• Research on International Financial Institutions (IFIs)
and corporations involved
in PPP investment or policy decisions.
• Development of campaigns focused on International
Financial Institutions or corporations
• Development of sister city or sister parish relationships
amongst grassroots, labor, environmental and indigenous organizations
that support community-based
economic initiatives and/or defend targeted communities in
Central America
and Mexico.
Additionally,
Participants identified several areas of emphasis for US-based
solidarity work:
•
Identify and support important previous and ongoing PPP work.
• Promote mutual information and education exchange
(between North and
South)
• Support voices of organizations representing targeted
communities
struggling to establish economic social and cultural autonomy
and
self-determination.
• Draw links between the globalizing policies of the
promoters of PPP and
their potential effects on targeted communities in US and
Mexico and Central
America.
• Support the capacity building efforts of Central American
and
Mexican-based community organizations.
• Strengthen North-South, North-North and, if possible,
South-South
organizational relationships.
Furthermore, on November 24, 2001 in Xelaju, Guatemala, over
800 participants representing 300 social and environmental
organizations from all over the world declared (in part):
“…For
the men and women present at the Xelaju Forum, the PPP is
a ready-made geopolitical project to build, in Mesoamerica,
an area of services and infrastructure, designed according
to the logic of trans-national corporations, national oligarchy
groups and international financial institutions. The central
axes of this project are, a services infrastructure for the
export of goods, and the exploitation of our natural resources,
our bio-diversity and the labour of our peoples. The PPP does
not respond in any way to the social logic of the Mesoamerican
people and their communities…
In addition to that, the conception and building of the PPP
has been anti-democratic, to the point at which the Central
American governments approved a design prepared by the Mexican
government, acting as an intermediary for the US government.
Whichever way it is analyzed, it is a project that goes against
the sovereignty of our countries and the self-determination
of peoples. On another level, it is a project that does not
take into consideration the rights of workers or migrant workers,
and it generates repressive policies towards them…
In the 2001 Xelaju Forum, we agreed that the social process
that rejects free trade and imposed globalization requires
the development of a larger number of social alliances among
popular and social organizations and NGOs. to advance specific
actions about concrete themes.
Therefore,
the organizations and peoples present at Xelaju 2001 agree:
1. To reject totally the Plan Puebla Panama.
2. To increase our efforts to systematize the experiences
and alternatives, of community and regional development which
are equitable, with justice and sustainability; as opposed
to the authoritarian and anti-democratic projects, results
of globalization and the PPP.
3. To produce an information campaign for the people and local
authorities, about the PPP and its effects. We also reject
the FTAA because it goes against the independent development
of our peoples.
4. To promote the establishment of a network of Mesoamerican
peoples and organizations to oppose globalization and the
PPP.
5. To develop a plan of coordinated mobilization, at the local,
national, and regional levels, in relation to our demands.
6. To convoke the organizations and peoples of the Mesoamerican
region to prepare and participate in the Third International
Forum, that will take place in Nicaragua in 2002.
7. The participants in the 2001 Xelaju Forum condemn all forms
of militarization in the Mesoamerican region, and we express
our categorical rejection of the Plan Colombia and we favour
an advance of the peace process in that country.
8. The Xelaju Forum ratifies its support of the Hemispheric
Social Alliance and the World Social Forum, and we feel part
of them.
9. The 2001 Xelaju Forum expresses its solidarity with the
struggle of all the peoples against the imposition of globalization.”
We
support and offer the above suggestions as possible ways in
which organizations can join the international struggle against
the PPP and for democratic alternatives. Again, we look to
southern partners for guidance in defining roles for groups
to take in the struggle against the PPP. In this network we
look forward to sharing information, experiences , opportunity
to support each others initiatives and collaborate respectfully
as we struggle to build a better world.
Compañeras
y Compañeros,
Saludos
solidarios de la Red de Solidaridad con México, el
Comité de Solidaridad con el Pueblo Salvadoreño
(CISPES), la Campaña por los Derechos Laborales, la
Red de Nicaragua, Acción para las Comunidad y la Ecología
de Centro América (ACERCA), Rights Action, EPICA, NISGUA,
Global Exchange, el Centro por la Salud el Medioambiente y
la Justicia (CHEJ), el Comité de Solidaridad Indígena
(Washington DC), y el Comité por la Justicia Social
y IDEX. Unidamente ofrecemos nuestra solidaridad en la oposición
al Plan Puebla Panamá y en la construcción de
alternativas democráticas y justas en México
y América Central. Consideramos la reunión histórica
a llevarse a cabo en Xela como nuestra guía para definir
el papel y la función futura que desempeñaran
los grupos de Estados Unidos y Canadá en la lucha contra
el PPP.
La
coalición con base en Estados Unidos y Canadá
se formó el 1 de Octubre del 2001, cuando 25 organizaciones
se reunieron en Washington DC para coordinar esfuerzos solidarios
con las organizaciones de Centro América y de México
que representan comunidades en contra del PPP y que apoyan
las iniciativas de dichas comunidades en su búsqueda
por la justicia económica, social y ambiental.
La
reunión trato varios aspectos relacionados al PPP,
incluyendo:
•
Breves presentaciones sobre los posibles efectos del PPP en
los pequeños campesinos, pueblos indígenas y
el medio ambiente.
• Una sesión de estrategia para analizar las
contribuciones que una coalición basada en Estados
Unidos y Canadá podría aportar para luchar en
contra del PPP
• Identificación de seis áreas iniciales
principales que guiarían el trabajo de la coalición.
Identificamos
las siguientes posibles estrategias:
•
Una campaña educativa a nivel general sobre el PPP
dirigida a audiencias críticas del pueblo estadounidense
y canadiense.
• Desarrollo de material educativo popular en inglés
y en español.
• Movilización de los sectores concientizados
de la sociedad estadounidense y canadiense para cabildear
a los representantes de sus respectivos gobiernos sobre temas
relacionados con el PPP.
• Investigación de las Instituciones Financieras
Internacionales (IFIs) y de las corporaciones implicadas en
la inversión o en las políticas de decisión
sobre el PPP.
• Desarrollo de campañas centradas en las IFIs
o en las corporaciones involucradas.
• Desarrollo de una relación de ciudad hermana
o parroquia hermana entre organizaciones de base, sindicales,
ecologistas e indígenas que apoyen las iniciativas
económicas de comunidades de base y/o defiendan a comunidades
directamente afectadas por el PPP en América Central,
México, Canadá y los Estados Unidos.
Los
participantes identificaron varias áreas principales
para desarrollar un
trabajo de solidaridad desde los Estados Unidos y el Canadá:
•
Identificar y apoyar el importante trabajo previo y actual
que se esta realizando sobre la lucha contra el PPP.
• Promover información mutua e intercambio educativo
(entre Norte y Sur)
• Apoyo a las voces de las organizaciones que representan
comunidades
afectadas directamente por las consecuencias del PPP y que
están luchando
por una autonomía y autodeterminación económica,
social y cultural.
• Entender las conexiones entre las intenciones globalizadoras
de los promotores del PPP y sus efectos potenciales sobre
las comunidades
directamente afectadas en México, América Central,
Canadá y los Estados Unidos.
• Apoyar los esfuerzos de capacitación de los
grupos de base en América Central y México.
• Reforzar las relaciones organizativas Norte-Sur, Norte-Norte
y si es posible, Sur- Sur.
Ofrecemos
estas sugerencias como posibles maneras por medio de las cuales
las organizaciones basadas en los Estados Unidos y el Canadá
puedan unirse a la lucha en contra del PPP y a la lucha por
alternativas democráticas. Quisiéramos repetir,
que miramos hacia el encuentro de Xela como nuestra guía
para definir los papeles futuros que las organizaciones estadounidenses
y canadienses pudiesen desempeñar. Esperamos con gran
expectativa el poder trabajar juntos respetuosa y colaborativamente
a medida que luchamos por un mundo mejor.
| |